Untitled
-
Honestly, Brevoort, this is getting ridiculous. Do you guys honestly think that not putting Sue Storm/Invisible Woman on the A-Force cover is going to dampen the sales potential of Fox Studios' future Fantastic Four movies? Does Disney honestly think that having the character on the cover would cause Fox's future movies to be more successful? This is disturbingly ridiculous and it is regrettable that Disney-Marvel is holding the comics hostage in this infantile movie studio war.
Anonymous
You are assuming that anybody involved here wanted the Invisible Woman on that cover in the first place, and as I’ve said a few times now, about that you are mistaken. You might as well be asking me why D-Man isn’t on that piece—we gave him just as much legitimate thought as we did Sue. She is not a part of the series, she is not relevant to it, and nobody held anybody hostage to make it that way. End-stop.
Yeah… Because why WOULD you want the First Lady of Marvel on the cover… My guess is she’s not on the team for the same reason shes not on the cover. Somebody in an office bigger than yours told you the deal
idrawpaintings liked this
seandamienhill liked this
carlosjdrew liked this antifanboydevon reblogged this from brevoortformspring
brevoortformspring posted this